Prediction of Akasha Urhobo [289th] vs Iva Jovic [141st] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L W W W W L
Form
W W W W L W W L W LHead-2-Head: Urhobo 1 - 1 Jovic
They have played 5 sets in total, with Urhobo winning 3 and Jovic winning 2. The last match between Urhobo and Jovic was at the W100 Tyler, 24-10-2024, Second, Hard with Iva Jovic getting the victory 1-6 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Akasha Urhobo | 1 |
| Iva Jovic | 1 |
| Urhobo | Stats | Jovic |
|---|---|---|
| 63% (10-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 63% (10-6) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 289 | Ranking | 141 |
| 282 | Highest Rank | 141 |
| 18 | Age | 17 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 1 | Titles | 3 |
| 59% (67-46) | Career Total W/L | 72% (50-19) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $379,420 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-6 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Iva Jovic
Player
Akasha Urhobo
62%
(
52 of
84)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
49%
(
41 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
||||
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats
Akasha Urhobo
Player
Iva Jovic
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 24 | Games Won | 17 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:37:0 | Average Match Time | 1:37:0 |
| 69% (91/131) | 1st Serve % | 63% (91/145) |
| 55% (50/91) | 1st Serve Win % | 49% (45/91) |
| 48% (19/40) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (27/54) |
| 39% (11/28) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 54% (7/13) |
| 50% (73/145) | Return Points Win % | 47% (62/131) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Akasha Urhobo vs Iva Jovic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Urhobo 1 - 1 Jovic
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Urhobo has won 42.98% of points on their second serve, while Jovic has won 39.88%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Urhobo, in recent form, has won 50.8% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jovic has won 51.88%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.74% and 35.18% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Urhobo has saved 40.91% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jovic has saved 45.32% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Urhobo has won 61.22% of matches played (W/L 30/ 19), with Jovic winning 73.91% (W/L 34/ 12) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Urhobo has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 70% (W/L 49/ 21), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4). Jovic has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 74% (W/L 40/ 14), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Urhobo has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 63.83% of matches (W/L 30/ 17), where as Jovic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 78.95% of matches (W/L 30/ 8). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Urhobo winning 1 times and Jovic being victorious 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Urhobo winning 3 and Jovic winning 2. The last match between Urhobo and Jovic was at the W100 Tyler, 24-10-2024, Second, Hard with Iva Jovic getting the victory 1-6 6-4 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:37:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Urhobo and Jovic have played a deciding set 1 times, with Urhobo winning 0 times and Jovic 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Urhobo winning 0, and Jovic 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Urhobo has played against opponents with an average rank of 183.9 while Jovic has played against players with an average rank of 112.07.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Urhobo has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jovic has won 77% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Urhobo has converted 38.94% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jovic has converted 43.38% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Akasha Urhobo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Whitney Osuigwe
Player
Akasha Urhobo
80%
(
49 of
61)
1st Serve %
82%
(
50 of
61)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
49%
(
30 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Akasha Urhobo
Player
Iryna Shymanovich
63%
(
10 of
16)
1st Serve %
40%
(
6 of
15)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
80%
(
8 of
10)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
83%
(
5 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Rtn Points Won
80%
(
12 of
15)
25
Total Points Won
6
|
6-0 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Akasha Urhobo
Player
Diletta Cherubini
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
64%
(
21 of
33)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Akasha Urhobo
Player
Alana Smith
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Akasha Urhobo
Player
Malaika Rapolu
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ana Sofia Sanchez
Player
Akasha Urhobo
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
0
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
59
|
6-1 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Akasha Urhobo
Player
Wakana Sonobe
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Akasha Urhobo
Player
Jamie Loeb
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
64%
(
23 of
36)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
60
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R3 | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Iva Jovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Julia Riera
Player
Iva Jovic
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Iva Jovic
Player
Alycia Parks
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
7
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Iva Jovic
56%
(
50 of
89)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
94)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
44%
(
39 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
94)
92
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(3) 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Iva Jovic
Player
Julia Grabher
55%
(
43 of
78)
1st Serve %
62%
(
47 of
76)
2
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
84
Total Points Won
70
|
2-6 7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Iva Jovic
Player
Kylie Mckenzie
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
59%
(
17 of
29)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
44%
(
24 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Kayla Cross
Player
Iva Jovic
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
32%
(
9 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Iva Jovic
Player
Maria Mateas
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
77%
(
58 of
75)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
33 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
39 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Iva Jovic
Player
Alyssa Ahn
55%
(
43 of
78)
1st Serve %
57%
(
54 of
95)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
34 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
47 of
95)
91
Total Points Won
82
|
6-0 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Iva Jovic
Player
Veronica Miroshnichenko
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF | 6-3 4-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
view more
Where To Watch Urhobo vs Jovic?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Urhobo Vs Jovic is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (67/46) | Win/Loss | 72% (50/19) |
| 58% (149/106) | Sets Win/Loss | 69% (106/48) |
| 54% (1246/1069) | Games Win/Loss | 58% (816/602) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 174 | Aces Total | 72 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 248 | Total Double Faults | 113 |
| 1:17:46 | Average Match Time | 1:39:27 |
| 167.92 | Average Opponent Rank | 160.17 |
| 67% (4175/6190) | 1st Serve % | 59% (2473/4171) |
| 60% (2520/4175) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (1545/2473) |
| 49% (980/2016) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (869/1698) |
| 48% (394/828) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (306/601) |
| 46% (2978/6439) | Return Points Win % | 49% (2127/4332) |
| 59% (66/112) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 73% (49/67) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 44% (7/16) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 38% (5/13) |
| 47% (14/30) | Deciding Set Win % | 61% (11/18) |
| 89% (72/64) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (47/43) |
| 11% (72/8) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (47/4) |
| 7% (41/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 32% (22/7) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
